<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sparkymat &#187; firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sparkymat.net/tag/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sparkymat.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 04:11:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>An obligatory post on Chrome</title>
		<link>http://blog.sparkymat.net/2008/09/04/an-obligatory-post-on-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.sparkymat.net/2008/09/04/an-obligatory-post-on-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>max</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sparkymat.net/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of days back, Google Chrome was launched. The Firefox crowd scratched their heads and muttered &#8216;What the hell?!&#8217;, the Opera crowd sighed and the IE crowd pretended they didn&#8217;t notice. Apart from the usual Google trumpet-blowing, what caught my atttention was benchmarks that claimed that it was faster than the competition by a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of days back, Google Chrome was launched. The Firefox crowd scratched their heads and muttered &#8216;What the hell?!&#8217;, the Opera crowd sighed and the IE crowd pretended they didn&#8217;t notice. Apart from the usual Google trumpet-blowing, what caught my atttention was benchmarks that claimed that it was faster than the competition by a HUGE margin. So, out of obligation to my experimental side, I tried it out. My feelings are as follows.</p>
<p><strong>The Good</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Fast. Blazingly fast. Blows the compeition clean out of the water (IE7/8 would hit escape velocity)</li>
<li>Clean, slick (white) interface. Typical Google-ish style. Nice and easy-to-use.</li>
<li>Open source!</li>
<li>Larger real-estate. Title-bar and menu-bar done away with.</li>
<li>(Possibly) The ability to kill individual scripts/tabs via the &#8220;task manager&#8221; (haven&#8217;t tried this out yet)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The Bad</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Not available on Linux/Mac (yet)</li>
<li>Per-tab memory consumption is larger (though for my typical usage, the total seems to be lesser)</li>
<li>Extensions</li>
<li>Themes</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The Ugly</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Have you seen the EULA?!!! (this has been corrected now)</li>
<li>Security. Where the hell is my security? (http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16889)</li>
<li>Anti-phishing (not sure if its there in Chrome)</li>
<li>Google (post pending on my long-standing distrust of Google, and yes, I do use their search a lot)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The Meh</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Separate process per tab &#8211; Mixed bag. Task-manager : good. Overhead : bad.</li>
<li>Mozilla: &#8220;<em>How could you do this to us?!&#8221;</em></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The Random</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Was fastest browser for a whole day (or two?) before Mozilla came out with benchmark results that showed the Firefox 3.1 nightly build to be faster than Chrome (or was it just V8 vs TraceMonkey?)</li>
<li>Linux users can build PARTS of it. x-( . Well, screw you Google! We will stay loyal to Mozilla! (of course, only until you release the Linux version <img src='http://blog.sparkymat.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</li>
<li>Most of the &#8216;bad&#8217; and the &#8216;ugly&#8217; will (probably) get fixed in subsequent releases, but some things won&#8217;t change.</li>
<li>What are they planning?</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.sparkymat.net/2008/09/04/an-obligatory-post-on-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
